User talk:Stephen Gilbert

New ship table template

I've spent the last few days working on a new ship table template to enable us to centralise the editing of things like weapons outfits for a particular class of ships in one template (so with the Fletchers or Gearings or other big classes you only have to edit in one place to alter a mistake rather than in dozens or hundreds). Please have a look at the WikiProject Ships page's talk section and see what you think. I haven't written the instructions for using it yet, and I want to see whether there are any table cells people would like me to include that aren't present yet. There are two example tables, one with all the optional cells present, and the other with some excluded. David Newton 14:04, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

So you're the one responsible

...and I'd like to say thanks. You gave us Unusual Articles, and all of us bent and twisted people owe you a debt of thanks for leading the way:

Thank you. Thank you so very, very much. -Litefantastic 00:21, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Templates-for-Deletion entry: Template:Musicbrainz wiki box

see Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Musicbrainz_wiki_box
This TFD-entry has too few discussion points for me to make a judgement as to consensus. Could you consider providing your opinion as you provided input to the MusicBrainz article back in early 2003? Thanks for considering this. Courtland 01:46, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

==== Wayback Machinebdbdbbddco

Heading text

====

Nashville user?

I noticed you were trying to get in touch with Lane Wright; sorry, I can't help you there, but did you try the "E-mail this user" link on the left column of his user page?

I'm actually contacting you to get an idea of other Wikipedians around Nashville. I'm compiling a small list of users in the area. Are you in or around Nashville? See also Category:Wikipedians in Tennessee. --J. J. 18:26, 2005 September 6 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply! --J. J. 19:20, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User Categorisation

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Canada page as living in or being associated with New Brunswick. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in New Brunswick for instructions.--Rmky87 21:23, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Canada

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there! -- user:zanimum

Commincation Article

I noticed that you last post ong the commincation talk page in 2003. I waas wondering about your progress on the update for that page. I am looking at taking it up to make a viable encyclodpia article. Is there anything I should know?Kyle.Mullaney 08:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Nucleus ER golgi ex.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nucleus ER golgi ex.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -SCEhard T 04:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear you,

let me tell that Nucleus ER golgi ex.jpg is the most beautiful image i've seen in my life

best regards,

me 82.66.23.99 (talk) 12:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hey Stephen, my names Mike and I'm from Los Angeles. I'm stuck in a youth Rehab right now in the middle of Kansas and I’d like to wreak a little havoc on our network, which consists of about 15 PCs. You seem pretty literate in means of computing, and I’m not too, so it would be much appreciated if you could give me some pointers on how I could go about doing this. I have basic knowledge on Command Prompt, but would like to learn more. The sites we are able to visit consist of about four, and it would be nice to get through their firewall, and be able to do more things. I am on the admin. account, so if you could throw out any suggestions on what I could do, and how, that would be awesome. Thanks..

Fear and Loathing 02:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response on your talk page. -- Stephen Gilbert 20:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen, this was most definitely not the answer I was looking for. See, the thing is, I am restricted to only a couple of web sites that I am able to view. Open internet is a problem. Wikipedia is my only form of information right now. I appreciate the links, but am not able to view them. I am at a lack of motivation to learn in depth about computers, and my ambitions are not set towards something of that magnitude. As humans, we want in now, or not at all. I was merely looking for a quick answer to which I threw out a question. What you speak is true. Fear and Loathing 16:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Map of irish counties1998.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Map of irish counties1998.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -SCEhard T 02:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article proposed for deletion

ArtCyclopedia

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article ArtCyclopedia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

I decided to notify you because you were one of the earlier editors of that page. It was initially created by someone anonymous (owner of the website?), so I had no way to contact them.

Tullie 23:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

original Wikipedia logo

Hi! I noticed that you uploaded Image:Old wikipedia logo.png, though am unsure if you're the creator. I've asked at Wikipedia talk:Logos and slogans if anyone knows what the text of the logo is taken from, and was referred your way. Could you drop by and fill us in? Thanks, Banyan Tree 22:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Electronic underground community

An editor has nominated Electronic underground community, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic underground community and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Award

User:ComputerGuy890100/Jimbo Edit

I would like to present to you the I Edited Jimbo Wales' Userpage Barnstar! — ComputerGuy890100^{Talk to me}_{What I've done to help Wikipedia} 23:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nintendo

I have nominated Nintendo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SaiyanEmperor2008 (talk) 12:10, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To save you the effort of looking, I'll let you know that I've already closed this ridiculous AFD. JulesH (talk) 12:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of record labels

I have nominated List of record labels, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of record labels (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tavix (talk) 22:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Stephen Gilbert, I know this is a bit late, but welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like wikipedia and decide to stay. I am sorry that there are so many impersonal warning messages on your talk page. There are many editors who feel that your hard work here is important and valuable, especially me.

Need help?

If you are looking for help, you can just type:

...and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Or, please visit New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have!

If you have any questions at all, please message me. Again, welcome! Ikip (talk) 03:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created: List of record labels may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of record labels.

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for List of record labels: google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.

2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)

3. You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.

4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.

If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 03:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

WikiThanks

Thank you for the support, it seems like I am either getting super praise or super condemnation, with no in between. I have only been here since 2005 myself. I bet you have seen things change a lot here? Ikip (talk) 19:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Favor to ask

I need an outside observer's comments (and I think you are as outside as they come): Can you look at and comment on the removal of the dispute tag on Wikipedia:Television episodes, 3 like minded editors keep removing any tag, as they have done for the past year (evidence of this on talk page). Dispute tag removed Comprimise tag removed Comprimise tag removed [1]

Thanks. Ikip (talk) 19:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vatche Arslanian sm.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vatche Arslanian sm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User talk:Jimbo Wales

User talk:Jimbo Wales, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Jimbo Wales and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Jimbo Wales during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Techman224^Talk 16:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's because your the first contributor :). Techman224^Talk 16:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mailing list

I have nominated Mailing list, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailing list. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 11:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Sanders Peirce article

I've been looking at its earliest versions and I see that you did the first substantial writing (whole paragraphs, etc.). Quite a bit is still there in the current version. Some things which which you wrote have disappeared from it but should be put back in. I'll see to that eventually. The Tetrast (talk) 00:52, 17 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Historical review

Hi, Mr. Gilbert. I'm a wikipedist, but I'm afraid almost exclusively for the spanish wikipedia. Currently I'm involved in a retrospective of some of the first time steps in wikipedia. I'm very intrigued in what moved you to make this edit in WP:NOT on June 15th 2002, I mean the concrete circumstances. I would appreciate greatly if you could drop me just some words in my talk page here, or better -if possible- in my talk page at the spanish wikipedia. With my deepest appreciation for your very early contributions, Yours, --Gustavocarra (talk) 19:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Project Galactic Guide

I have nominated Project Galactic Guide, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Galactic Guide. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 22:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Internet encyclopedia project

I have nominated Internet encyclopedia project, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet encyclopedia project. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WITF wants you

The World Intelligence Task Force would like to recruit you as an agent. If you accept, comment under the pending section on the project page. It is a relatively new task force and we need new members right away so if you are interested please don't be shy. At this moment in time we only have three members. If you want more information, please go to the project page.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SunCountryGuy01 (talk • contribs)

MystiCon AfD

Thanks for fixing the lost comments. I tried, and I think I just made things worse. :-) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 00:47, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Stephen,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Hex (❝?!❞) 02:42, 11 November 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hee. When I asked to be "desysopped", there was no administrator policy. If I ever lose my mind and want super-administrator powers back, I'll be sure to fill out the all the right forms in triplicate. Now, get off my lawn, young whippersnapper! ;) --Stephen Gilbert (talk) 03:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I can outrun an oldtimer like you! MBisanz ^talk 16:19, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your user and talk pages

Hi Stephen, I found your user and talk pages while doing some wikiarchaeology. . I have restored all of their earliest surviving revisions from old copies of the Wikipedia database, so they are available to everyone now. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 08:02, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your archaeological work! I appreciate it. -- Stephen Gilbert (talk) 18:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Microsoft Word

Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Microsoft Word, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Microsoft Word and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Microsoft Word during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. the wub "?!" 17:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 09:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I'm still around, just not particularly active. --Stephen Gilbert (talk) 15:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2.PAK for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2.PAK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2.PAK until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ― Padenton|✉ 20:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 20-GATE for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 20-GATE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20-GATE until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ― Padenton|✉ 16:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Stephen Gilbert. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Stephen Gilbert. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question

you've been around the block, what was old wikipedia circa 2002 like? (I Dan tha Man I (talk) 06:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Stephen Gilbert. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heee

Hee, How're you? (: Kind regards, some youngster Wikipedian TruthToBeSpoken (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Stephen Gilbert,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Avonlea (Anne of Green Gables)

The article Avonlea (Anne of Green Gables) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Glossary

Wikipedia:Glossary, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Glossary and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Glossary during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 19:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Digital Village for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Digital Village is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Digital Village until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ahmetlii (talk) 21:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Association des Bibliophiles Universels

The article Association des Bibliophiles Universels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

SOurcing isn't there in either language to indicate this was a notable project, no evidence of WP:ORG/WEB

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 22:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	great job on all your hard work Jartfart (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Satyricon(band)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Satyricon(band) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 21 § Satyricon(band) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 02:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Article Alert

I noticed you have contributed immensely to creating new pages on existing Countries today such as Israel and Netherlands. This is to notify you of the ongoing discussion here on Biafra. Fugabus (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]