Jump to content

Talk:List of prisons in the United Kingdom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Naming

[edit]

I came here from a link (and found the location was wrong, so corrected it). More to the point, there didn't appear to be a consistent naming scheme, so I'm going through and creating one using the formal names structure, ie. "HMP Slade" with the pagenames as "Slade {HM Prison)" so that the pipe trick may be used. This also has the benefit of automatically disintermediating UK prisons from others (for instance, 'Albany prison' linked to the one in Australia, not the Isle of Wight!) --Vamp:Willow 11:52, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've now discovered that "Her Majesty's Prisons" exist outside the UK. I hadn't realised we still exported convicts! anyway, all the renaming is done and redirects disintermediated (except one section when I lost my line but I shall do that now). Noting that a lot of the UK prisons have very little information I might consider it as "my project" when I get some time. --Vamp:Willow 22:11, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have preferred to see HMP Slade, which is also unambigous, and is the usual form in prose. Morwen - Talk 09:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
So would I. Proteus (Talk) 20:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Table

[edit]

This would really be more useful as a sortable table... anyone feel like doing it? Mauls 18:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now working on it (just when you thought it would never happen!) DB 103245 talk 20:07, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on the new table format much more usable. Keith D (talk) 00:41, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

[edit]

Further to the above, I'm working on fleshing out the table, and intend to add refs as necessary. DB 103245 talk 20:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a great table and long overdue. Any chance all the Young Offenders Insitutions and Juvenile prisons can have their security category also put in the notes section? ...as they are graded. Also, I can't help feel that the 'historic' (or more precisely defunct) prisons should be taken out of this list and possibly put in another. After all, this article doesnt even list all of the historic prisons in the UK (with wiki articles), and to add them would make the list large and unweildy. Any thoughts? Bleaney (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I had thought to remove the historic bits altogether - I've split them into another table for now rather than outright deletion. As for grading, are you aware of any decent sources other than the HMPS website? It seems to be a bit hit and miss when it comes to grading, although I haven't dug too deeply yet. It would help if the lines between different grades didn't appear to be so blurred... Next steps I can identify are to finish capacity column with refs, finish 'grading' - perhaps with it's own column, and either have notes as a new column or do away with it? Also might be worth adding in opening dates. Obviously Scotland and Ireland should follow when England & Wales is up to scratch. I'm about done for this evening, unless I get a bout of insomnia tonight, but will continue tomorrow afternoon. DB 103245 talk 22:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately grading of prisons (i.e. their security category) is a little blurred. Many Category B prisons have Category C wings, and Some Category A prisons have Category B AND Category C wings. The only definitive place on the web I have come across at present is the individual prison pages on the HMPS website, although even there, not all prison pages are explicit about their grading. It's also worth mentioning that women's prisons are also graded, but to a different structure (Category A, Closed Category, Semi-Open Category, and Open Category). In light of this, a separate 'Grade' column (possibly called 'Security Category') could be a good idea, as essentially ALL prisons in England and Wales have some type of grading. There also may be a problem with the 'Young Offenders Institute' and 'Juvenile Detention Centre' labels, as many adult prisons now have YOI wings and some YOI's have juvenile wings. This is particularly true of women's prisons. Again, the lines have been blurred. Bleaney (talk) 23:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... not sure on the best way to present complex categories in a table format. One possible solution would be to present more general info - ie just note which are YOI, JDC, and womens facilities (as I've already done with Private sector prisons), and ensure that fuller info about security cats is included in the actual articles (I think it already is included in most if not all articles anyway). Anyways, this time I really must leave it for tonight - gotta get some sleep :-) DB 103245 talk 01:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed reference to security cats for now until a user friendly way of displaying the information can be found - the official sources seem to be a bit hit and miss with what info they show, so referencing could be a problem. I've also had thoughts about merging the info about secure hospitals into the main prison table as there are so few - any thoughts? Meanwhile I'm plodding through adding capacity info. DB 103245 talk 17:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Security categories

[edit]

I've now populated the England & Wales table with capacity figures, and differentiated adult prisons from young offenders (not highlighted juvenile facilities as yet). Having done that I've tested out a few ideas for displaying security categories - the best I can come up with is this:

Name Location County Operator Capacity Adults Young
Offenders		 Juveniles
HMP Male Example Exampleshire 1001 Green tickY Category A/B
YOI Female Test Testshire Private 101 Category C

Obviously(?) blue denotes male only inmates, and pink denotes female (yes I know it's cliched but i'm open to suggestions) - that only leaves Peterborough which accepts both male and female. Also I'm not sure whether it looks better with or without the tick - any comments? I'll leave it a couple of days before actually changing anything - meanwhile I'm going to look at improving the Scottish table. Lastly I'm assuming YOI which don't specify sex are male only - can anyone confirm? DB 103 245-7 Talk 16:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is much better, though again, remember that women's prisons are not generally rated as Category B/C, they use their own classifications. I think its fair to assume that YOI's that dont specify are male. Just a note as well to say that Scottish prisons dont use the Catefory A/B/C/D system, they generally follow the American system of Maximum, Medium and Minimum Security prisons, though again, some prisons are vague as to their status. Bleaney (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I quite like the tick! Bleaney (talk) 16:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comments, Bleaney. Bear in mind that the categoryss I've displayed are just to illustrate the idea - they aren't based on any particular system. One compromise to avoid clouding the issue of security categories on this list would be as it currently stands - simply don't mention them, leaving it to the articles where it can be fully discussed in prose. I do think that including them would improve things if only a way can be found to display them concisely. If only things were simple! :-) Just for illustration here's the proposed table with no category included. I've also fixed column widths to improve the look of the thing.
Name Location County Operator Capacity Adults Young
Offenders 		Juveniles
HMP Male Example Exampleshire 1001 Green tickY
YOI Female Test Testshire Private 101

DB 103 245-7 Talk 17:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is problematic. And i'll admit that the security categories issue is probably why I have wimped out of trying to construct a table for this list before! On reflection I agree that perhaps the plethora of security categories in one list is undesirable... unless the list is split again, with women's prisons having their own table. That way, Security categories can be included in each list, with an appropriate link on each of their first entries to the corresponding section of Prison security categories in the United Kingdom. This would also avoid the need to use the blue/pink background. Any thoughts? Bleaney (talk) 18:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure about further splitting into Male and Female - perhaps a new column Gender between Capacity and Adults? Merge Young Offenders and Juveniles into a single column, Young People, and add a category column. I've retained the colours for now - it breaks up the monotony of an otherwise fairly bland table, although I'm happy for them to go (not sure what colour Peterborough should be if colour coding is retained). What seems to be the biggest pain is the joint prison/YOI such as Chelmsford and several others. This latest plan gives something like this (again, categories are just plucked out of the air, so to speak):
Name Location County Operator Capacity Gender Adults Young People Security Category
HMP Male Example Exampleshire 1001 Male Green tickY B-D
YOI Female Test Testshire Private 101 Female Green tickY Semi-Open
HMP/YOI Male Both Bothshire 501 Male Green tickY Green tickY C; YOI

On another note, I'm inclined to agree with earlier discussion that the name column should follow along the lines of HMP Slade, although this would potentially bugger up the sortability of the table, especially when it comes to the likes of HMP/YOI Chelmsford etc. Arrrrgggghhh!!!! DB 103 245-7 Talk 18:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol, i'm all out of suggestions, but your latest offer looks good. Shame we have to lose the juvenile/YOI separate clumns though. Oh dear, i'm not being very constructive am I? Bleaney (talk) 22:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary - i'm glad that someone else has an interest in seeing the list improved - it's getting personal now - it won't beat me lol. I merged the Young People columns to try and make the Sec Cat column less cluttered, but I've had another idea...:
Name Location County Operator Capacity Gender Juvenile Detention Centre Young Offenders Institution Adults Adult Security Category
HMP Male Example Exampleshire 1001 Male Red XN Red XN Green tickY B-C
YOI Female Test Testshire Private 101 Female Red XN Red XN Green tickY Semi-Open
HMP/YOI Male Both Bothshire 501 Male Red XN Green tickY Green tickY C

I've moved the adult column next to the sec cat column, and split young people again. Colours are gone, since I don't think they quite looked right isolated in the middle of the table, and I've introduced the Xs just to see hoe they look. I won't introduce any changes to the article until at least tomorrow night - hopefully by then someone else might pop by and offer an opinion. DB 103 245-7 Talk 00:33, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus, this is the daddy of all lists! I love it. This is exactly how I have always envisaged a prisons list table on this article. If no one else has an opinion ,then I say go for it. ! completely support this model, Well done! Bleaney (talk) 21:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coming back to an earlier point about problems with sorting on the name column. You could always use a hidden sort key for the column as per here to circumvent the initial HMP/YOI tags in the names. Keith D (talk) 22:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys. I hadn't thought of hidden sortkeys, although thinking about it I think I've seen it used before - I'll give it a try :-) I'll try and get a new version of the table sorted within the next couple of days. DB 103 245-7 Talk 05:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've done a small table for Northern Ireland in the new style - it's up now. I'm working on England & Wales in Userspace to save making dozens of edits to the main article - work in progress can be found here if you can't wait (shoud be done tomorrow or Sunday i reckon) User:DB 103245/Prisons draft DB 103 245-7 Talk 18:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update

[edit]

I'm still working on the England/Wales table in userspace here. Only thing which doesn't look quite right is the operator column, with all it's white space (11 private prisons out of 130-odd total). I've tried greying out the blank fields but that looks worse if anything. I propose removing the column (with the added bonus of improving the width of other columns on small screens), and adding footnotes to denote privately run prisons. Any thoughts? DB 103 245-7 Talk 10:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add that it's taking a bit longer than planned to complete as I'm aiming to ensure it's fully referenced before I copy it over. DB 103 245-7 Talk 11:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

Following on from the discussion above, this page definitely needs categories on it, it's severely lacking without those. Is anyone able to do it? I don't think the table needs to be that complex, just one more column. --GedUK  14:18, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Most external references to the various prisons on this page are dead. 05May2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:E984:3801:71B2:E6D7:FEE:6A3B (talk) 13:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HMP Verne?

[edit]

This (supposed) prison is mentioned in today's Daily Mirror [1] Paul, in Saudi (talk) 09:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of prisons in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:13, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on List of prisons in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of prisons in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_prisons_in_the_United_Kingdom&oldid=1248018986"