Jump to content

Talk:Charles Stross

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Future Laundryverse novel ref

[edit]

"Nope, TFM is set in 2012. CNG has been rescheduled. And yes, there is One True Religion (and we know how to deal with elder god worshippers when we find them).
(That's a major plot point in book #4 -- Christian or Muslim fundamentalists in the Laundryverse are not merely wrong and misguided, they may unwittingly be serving Powers we really don't want to see served.)"

http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2010/08/interview-1.html#comment-56942 --Gwern (contribs) 19:59 28 August 2010 (GMT)

Neptune's Brood

[edit]

I assume it is now appropriate to put Neptune's Brood back as a standalone article? The claim in the merge discussion that the material would simply be folded into this article is completely absurd after the fact. Choor monster (talk) 15:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you have some sources (like reviews), I say go ahead and restore it and add them. If anyone challenges you at that point, there can be another discussion. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it has been recreated, three reviews cited and quoted, some start at actual article content. I am not trying very hard to make it a "real" article, and leave that to others. Personally, I would delete the Scrivener section. Choor monster (talk) 18:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting the Merchant Princes series

[edit]

How about something like:

Blah blah blah (all the general information, in one or two paragraphs) followed by:

  • The Bloodline Feud (2013, ISBN 978-1447237617)

etc.? Choor monster (talk) 13:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bisexuality

[edit]

Mr Stross does not make a big deal out of it, but he is an out bisexual. In his own words:

Like I'd want their blood money? Hint: LGBT here. (Subtype: invisible married bisexual.)

http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2015/04/the-biggest-little-sf-publishe.html#comment-1967690 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.172.96.29 (talk) 10:20, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's it? If it's that low-key by Stross, then it really doesn't deserve any mention by WP. Choor monster (talk) 13:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree—this is exactly what WP:BLPSELFPUB is for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.190.226.98 (talk) 23:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I said "low-key", not "unreliable". You haven't contradicted what I said at all. Choor monster (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The subject said so himself on his blog, seems valid to me, but I'd suggest a 3rd opinion. I'd suggest taking this to WP:RSN or WP:BLPN. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No one is disputing the truth of the claim, or the reliability of the source. I doubt anyone who is interested in Stross considers "bisexuality" the least bit "contentious". There are no RS or BLP issues. You're just wasting everyone's time.
  • The dispute concerns exactly what has been stated from the beginning here: WP:UNDUE. It's a clear-cut violation, and we will wait until some 3rd party reliable sources think it's worth a mention. Choor monster (talk) 12:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charles Stross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of some of his novels by series?

[edit]

A number of the individual book articles for Stross are currently quite short. Would it make sense to just merge them together into articles like The Merchant Princes or The Laundry Files? (maybe not for Halting State, since that's a looser "series" with Rule 34, but.) No content would be lost, it'd just be in a list-like article instead. SnowFire (talk) 18:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Stross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charles Stross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Stross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Stross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Former Programmer?

[edit]

Idk about "former" programmer. Had a job as a programmer.. Sure .. Former doctor.. Former engeneer?? ~It just looks weird. Does anyone have any opinions surounding this? 109.236.142.43 (talk) 17:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Charles_Stross&oldid=1212472994"