User talk:Rawja

Welcome!

Hello, Rawja, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language

Happy editing!

Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:46, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Images

Hello Rawja-

Many of the images that you've recently uploaded to the Wikipedia don't have source information. For example, Image:1990oldsmobilesilhouettesmall.jpg, Image:92silverluminaAPVsmall.jpg, and Image:92transsportsmall.jpg.

If you hold the copyright on these images, it's a really good idea to note that on the page. Otherwise, we have to assume that the images aren't available for free use, and will likely be deleted. Additionally, Image:Admsimage.jpg has a public-domain tag, but there's no information about who released it into the public domain, and it's highly doubtful that it qualifies for PD status on its own. In general, it's necessary to add the public-domain release for an image that doesn't obviously qualify for this status—if you're the photographer, it's polite to add an explicit release; if you're not, you'll probably have to obtain and append a written release from the photographer.

Also, I've put some notes at the Talk:Chevrolet Lumina APV page. The work you've done so far there is great, and I'd love to see these pages maintained well!

Thanks

--Milkmandan 04:00, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response!

The biggest issue with having three different copies of the same information isn't space, it's consistency. Someone updating a factual inaccuracy, grammar mistake, or omission would have to check three different pages to keep things consistent. Over time, it's likely that the text in these three will stray away from each other and would likely be mutually inconsistent or even contradictory. Essentially, it places an extra burden on whoever updates the page next—and that's something we'd like to avoid.

Unless I'm mistaken, the Lumina+friends are really very closely related. With the exception of different sheetmetal and trim differences, the entire chassis and drivetrain is largely identical.

This type of situation occurs pretty frequently. There are three basic ways to handle it:

Build a page for the platform and place all the information specific to that platform (e.g., drivetrain) there. Carve off sections (or subpages, if there's enough information) for each of the models based off that platform. Each model section/page would contain information that applies only to that model.
Build a page for the dominant model in the series, and use subsections/pages to note where the other models differ. This is fairly standard around here, but subsections work far better than separate pages, for the reasons described above.
Name the page after the dominant model, but discuss all three models in parallel.

I'd probably go with the last one, here. I'm not an expert on these minivans, but it seems possible to write a coherent article addressing all three simultaneously. All three would work, and would solve the maintenance problem.

I'm trying to think of a counterexample, but can't really come up with a good one at the moment. Perhaps, the Chrysler 300M, which shares a ton of parts with the Dodge Intrepid, but which has had the engine turned so it's longitudinally. Or alternatively, the BMW Z3, which is mechanically very similar to the E36 BMW 3-Series, but which probably deserves its own page. None of these examples has a really well-developed set of Wikipedia pages yet, but I imagine they would be placed into separate pages with a note that they are, "mechanically strongly related to the ... "

Images are a tricky point. There aren't, as far as I can tell, any written standards on what constitutes a "reasonable" number of images. In the case of an automotive articles, I can see easily justifying one image for each distinct generation. Beyond that, there needs to be a reason in the text to support inserting a new image. This could be a discussion of an exceptional model, or perhaps a section noting the differences between two differently branded versions of the same chassis. The De Lorean DMC-12 is borderline, in my opinion, but it gets away with having so many images because there's more than enough text to back it all up. For example, the gallery of different hoods is fantastic, but the picture of the sun visor seems entirely unnecessary.

In the case of the Lumiva APV and others, it seems like there are far too many images to keep the text from getting cluttered. The shots of the concept van are great, but everything else seems a bit superfluous. If we do, for whatever reason, have an excess of exceedingly high-quality (and high resolution) shots, I'd say to append them at the end of the article with the gallery feature (see the De Lorean DMC-12#Hood styles section for the appropriate markup).

My experience has been that pages have images grouped on the right side to keep the text flow clean along the left. There's nothing wrong with breaking them into the center; in some cases (such as the Trans Sport concept images), it's necessary to keep them from getting pushed after the sidebar. It does tend to break up reading flow, however, and unless there's an overriding reason, the standard is to place them on the right.

Don't take anything I've said as law—I'm open to suggestions and welcome new ways of assembling articles. Having duplicate information seems like a very difficult thing to maintain, and it's something I'd like to see avoided.

Overall, however, your contributions have been fantastic so far. Both your prose and your editing seem above par, and it's pretty rare that we get new contributors who can develop such a well-developed article so quickly. Don't get discouraged—I'm looking forward to seeing great things from you in the future.

Thanks again!

--Milkmandan 17:13, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)

More APV excitement

Hello again Rawja- I agree that in certain cases, there's enough information to warrant splitting pages. I maintain that the organizational simplicity gained in grouping very similar topics is advantageous both in maintaining consistency as well as keeping the information immediately accessible, but in this case, I don't think there's a convincing argument either way. I'm more than willing to defer to you on these pages if you've got a plan in mind. Good luck! --Milkmandan 07:13, 2005 Apr 13 (UTC)

Auto pics

Although I concede that corporate press pictures are probably acceptable to Wikipedia under fair use, I feel that it is always preferrable to use a totally free (eg GFDL) picture if one is available. For this reason, I would ask that you not replace an existing free picture with a press department photo as in Cadillac SRX. Sure, the one you put in is better, but the other one was acceptable and free. I did not revert this since I suspect that you disagree. Perhaps we can take the discussion to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Automobiles? --SFoskett 15:07, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Image:1994OldsmobileSilhouette.jpg

Hi. I have listed Image:1994OldsmobileSilhouette.jpg on User:Smoddy/Fair use assessment, where I am checking fair use claims. I don't believe this image is verifiably fair use, and if you don't respond in a week, I shall list the image on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you don't think the image should be deleted, please go to that page and state your views, and your justification for fair use. Cheers, [[Smoddy]] 13:31, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Production years

Please don't change the production years for the first-gen GM U-body vans and the Cadillac Cimarron. I realize there's no such thing as a model year 1981 Cimarron and such, but production for that model started that year. --ApolloBoy 01:36, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:2004SilhouetteInterior.jpg

The image you uploaded, Image:2004SilhouetteInterior.jpg, has no no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:20, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:92transsportsmall.jpg

The image you uploaded, Image:92transsportsmall.jpg, has no no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:96OldsmobileSilhouetteInterior.jpg

The image you uploaded, Image:96OldsmobileSilhouetteInterior.jpg, has no no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:25, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:Aztektent-1.jpg

The image you uploaded, Image:Aztektent-1.jpg, has no no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:30, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:73lascala.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:73lascala.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. CLW 14:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:73lascala.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:73lascala.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CLW 14:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:June73SevillePrototype.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:June73SevillePrototype.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CLW 14:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:EuroTransSport96a.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:EuroTransSport96a.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Longhair 10:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:92transsport02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:92transsport02.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zsinj 19:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Important WikiProject Automobiles Discussion

Hello! As a Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles member, I just thought you might want to input your opinions on an important discussion we're currently having about whether articles regarding similar vehicles should be merged into one or split by brand. If you would like to comment or read further, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Articles of Similar Vehicles. Thank you in advance for your thoughts and feedback. Airline 23:49, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Pontiac_TransSport_1995.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pontiac_TransSport_1995.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:1987_Cadillac_Cimarron.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1987_Cadillac_Cimarron.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Buick Skylark GS 1990.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Buick Skylark GS 1990.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howch e ng {chat} 21:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Buick Skylark GS 1992.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Buick Skylark GS 1992.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howch e ng {chat} 21:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2002 Cadillac Escalade.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2002 Cadillac Escalade.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 04:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Automobiles Notification

Hi Rawja, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Rawja]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086^{Talk | Contribs} 04:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rawja. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rawja. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]