Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet is shit

Listed for speedy deletion, but I don't think it meets the criteria for speedy. I think it should be deleted because it is original research, and because the website http://www.internetisshit.org is non-notable, and because the content of the article is promotion for the website and its non-neutral point-of-view. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:31, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Oh, well... I guess it's a copyvio too, unless the creator of the article is also the author of the material on the website. Take a look at the website if you are interested... it's a long rant, fairly well-written, setting up the (straw man?) that some say the Internet is wonderful and Godlike, then knocking that down in detail. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:59, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Delete: I originally listed it for speedy deletion, but agree with User:Dpbsmith that VfD was more appropriate. POV, rant, straw-man, and non-notability (in Dpbsmith's words) about sum it up for me. Klanda 03:07, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Unencyclopedic (!) title, no useful content. The matter of the copyvio is irrelevant if there's consensus to delete anyway, so do whichever is easiest or fastest. Andrewa 03:21, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Delete. POV rant, possibly copyvio. Andris 14:20, Aug 16, 2004 (UTC)

Delete, if we're voting on it. I suppose it's not a speedy, but it's not a heavy deliberation, either. Geogre 17:50, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Delete very unencyclopedic, and also a C/R violation!--Plato 23:24, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)