User talk:Ahruman
Wiki Survey
Two researchers at James Madison University are conducting a study of wikis with health information pages. To participate in the survey click on https://websurvey.jmu.edu/ss/wsb.dll/27/wikipedia.htm
You are invited to participate.
Username
[edit]Just curious... what is the meaning of your username? The Behnam 06:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- It’s a misspelling of Ahriman – possibly subconciously influenced by Saruman. (For the record, I’ve been using the handle since well before the films.) -Ahruman 11:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Have you considered changing your username? Religious figures are not allowed, and the fact that this one happens to be the complete embodiment of evil and falsehood only makes this worse. It is like having a User:Satan, or User:Satun, etc. Frankly, it is disturbing and out of line with WP rules for usernames. It is completely inappropriate. The Behnam 18:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- My initial response failed to give full context. The name does not refer to the actual religious character, but the fictional derivative in Ormus och Ariman by Carl Jonas Love Almqvist, in which he does not represent complete evil, but rather chaos as opposed to stagnation and rigidity.
- In a broader context, I am opposed to unnecessarily broad applications of rules such as those in WP:U; banning every name which resembles or alludes to a religious figure, directly or indirectly, is clearly absurd – both because of the scope of the project and the fact that it would be censorship. I would also draw your attention to this comment on WP:RFC/NAME: “Policy states that [usernames which refer to politics or religion] should be reviewed, only names that either convince or detract religious/political views should be blocked. --wL” (emphasis mine).
- The name was not selected to be offensive, and certainly not to convince people to worship Angra Mainyu. (I don’t advocate worshipping anyone.) I have been using it for a decade without anyone interpreting it as such proselytization. In summary: no, I have no intention of voluntarily changing my name. If, however, you choose to carry this over to WP:RFC/NAME, and there is clear support for your view, I will change it. -Ahruman 20:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- There is a discussion happening at WP:RFC/NAME. John Reaves (talk) 05:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Specifically, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names#Ahruman (talk • contribs). This is turning out to be one of our more spirited debates. If nothing else, thanks for giving me an opportunity to bust out my theology reference books... I never would have guessed that, of all the areas of the encyclopedia, I'd be using them for the username comment board. ;-) EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- There is a discussion happening at WP:RFC/NAME. John Reaves (talk) 05:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Have you considered changing your username? Religious figures are not allowed, and the fact that this one happens to be the complete embodiment of evil and falsehood only makes this worse. It is like having a User:Satan, or User:Satun, etc. Frankly, it is disturbing and out of line with WP rules for usernames. It is completely inappropriate. The Behnam 18:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Ahruman. While there had been some discussion here about whether your username met Wikipedia policy on what usernames editors can use, the consensus was to allow it, and that discussion has now been closed. If you would like to see what concerns were raised, you can still find that discussion in the archive. You do not need to change your username. However, if you ever wish to do so, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name: simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page. Thank you. John Reaves (talk) 07:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Usrname
[edit]Your Username (Ahruman)
[edit]Hello Ahruman, thank you for your contributions. Wikipedia has a policy on what usernames editors can use. Unfortunately, concerns have been raised that your username may be incompatible with that policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it here. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page. Thank you. P.S. It seems that the disussion was closed to early. --wL<speak·check·chill> 21:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Ahruman. While there had been some discussion here about whether your username met Wikipedia policy on what usernames editors can use, the result was to allow it, and that discussion has now been closed. If you would like to see what concerns were raised, you can still find that discussion in the archive. You do not need to change your username. However, if you ever wish to do so, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name: simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. -- HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Gliese 581 c
[edit]Thank you for fixing my painfully obvious errors about the radius :) -- Stereo (talk) 01:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Research survey invitation
[edit]Greetings Ahruman-
My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:
https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss
Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.
This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.
If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon — Preceding unsigned comment added by UOJComm (talk • contribs) 03:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Mode 7 demonstration
[edit]I saw your work at File:Parallax-scroll-example.gif. I'm looking for a in-game gif just like this but with a fuller turn to better demonstrate Mode 7. If you're interested in making it or can find one, let me know. « Ryūkotsusei » 05:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Oolite-logo2.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Oolite-logo2.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 20:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Ahruman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Update about your query regarding "Peter Smith" reference link in "Mars Society" Wiki page !
[edit]Hai Ahruman!
Myself Suman, a graduate student at the University of Southern California. I'm currently working towards editing Mars Society page; as part of my coursework at USC [1].
I saw your comment on the Mars Society talk page, stating "The reference to Peter Smith links to a disambiguation page. It is not immediately clear which Peter Smith is meant." -Ahruman 13:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[2]
I just wanted to let you know that the reference to Peter Smith mentioned in the article is now updated and the link to his wiki page is here Peter Smith(Scientist at NASA, JPL) [3]
I will be working further to develop this page, to eliminate other issues. I would highly appreciate your suggestions and help!
Thanks
Suman B R
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ahruman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ahruman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ahruman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Oolite.org is down — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.233.190 (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)