Talk:Four Pillars

The United States Green Party did not define the Four Pillars, the European Green Party did. If you want a comprehensive article, you need someone who understands how they inter-relate to form a working consensus process. If you want accurate history, you need a European, not an American, to write it.

There is no basis for beliefs other than things your body experiences in an ecology. It's quite difficult to explain any Green concept without reference to body and ecology norms, or without coming across as if you're advocating them. If you apply the same standards of "neutral point of view" to people who destroy bodies and ecologies in large numbers to those that don't, or who think it's morally wrong, then you are making this The Ecodestruction Encyclopedia.

And that's not worth contributing to. No one minds intelligent edits or replacing 'leads to' with 'is claimed to lead to' or whatever such stuff.

But simply reverting every article that cares about body or ecology is evil.

Not just stupid. Evil.

Four pillars of application architecture

I was looking for information about these four pillars. --JadonK 23:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AC

Four people in the "Assassin's Creed community" are not notable enough to put on a disambiguation article, much less on Wikipedia at all. They don't even have a parent article to refer to. Deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D08:9582:5300:984C:CD75:7DDE:2633 (talk) 21:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]