Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 E16 km2
This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled 1 E16 km².
This page is kept as an historic record.
The result of the debate was to delete the article.
Is an orphan (apart from lists of dead end pages) and a dead end page. I would re-direct to 1 E16 m² (which the author meant) or 1 E10 m² (which is the equivalent in square metres, if my maths is right!) but being a dead end and an orphan, probably not much point. --Chuq 05:13, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
- This is almost like a "Jeopardy!" answer. All you have to do is figure out the question. I'll take "delete," Alex. - Lucky 6.9 05:21, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
- There doesn't seem to be any other "1 En km²". So either redirect to 1 E22 m², and let it be a precedent, or delete, I don't care much either way. This fact is already mentioned at 1 E16 m², in any case. -- Jao 07:41, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
- Now that's a good idea for Wikipedia! Distances! I should go write up an entry on '8.1 km', and after that, I should make sure it gets deleted because I don't picture Wikipedia as a virtual tape measure, for some strange reason. Delete. Lord Bob 14:45, May 19, 2004 (UTC)
- This is area, not distance, and for your interest there are plenty of pages on both length and area (and other quantities). These are useful for comparisons. No need to have these pages in multiple units, however, so delete this. Fredrik 16:09, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
- Boy, I phrased that one badly, didn't I? Lord Bob 16:21, May 19, 2004 (UTC)
- This is area, not distance, and for your interest there are plenty of pages on both length and area (and other quantities). These are useful for comparisons. No need to have these pages in multiple units, however, so delete this. Fredrik 16:09, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Obviously the guy meant square meters: "4.38×1010 km2 equated to 438,000,000,00 Km²". Mikkalai 20:26, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Everyking 21:12, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not all facts are encyclopedic. But the portion of this article that is factual is already contained in the article on Saturn. Dpbsmith 23:27, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.