Talk:Bribery

Archives (Index)

2011 2012 2014 2016 2017 2019

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 6 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nmr129, Emilysoulias, Kellybo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cantstavwontstav, ThomasB111. Peer reviewers: Rp8, Priyap97.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Should sermons be deleted from this article? Should an encyclopedia utter a should?

Article sermonizes: "Yet, if money serves to satisfy secondary – psychological – needs, we should search for deeper motives of bribe taking." I recommend that such statements be deleted or changed. (PeacePeace (talk) 02:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC))

I agree with you. I am not an attorney, so cannot say if you are correct or not, but from a gut feel, I agree. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 16:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

=Wiki Education assignment: International and Comparative Public Management== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2022 and 14 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ab7155 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Noah Wetz, Htetnaingoo9.

— Assignment last updated by PeaceProsperityDemocracy (talk) 13:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Similarities?

Hey, according to Earwig's Copyvio Detector, this article is over 90% similar to "Bribery Assignment" at Scribd, which is under an attribution-noncommercial copyright according to the description. I wonder if the article needs a rewrite or something. I do not know when "Bribery Assignment" has been written, so I wonder if the document is taking from this Wikipedia article or not. CarlFilip19 (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure. The only archived version is 2019 (here) but is not displaying properly. Perhaps copyvio expert Diannaa may be able to advise how to determine what to do in a case like this? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, maybe Diannaa can help. CarlFilip19 (talk) 10:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

The Scribd document is titled "OUMM 3203: Professional Ethics Bribery Assignment". Googling "OUMM 3203: Professional Ethics" shows that this is a course offered by the Open University Malaysia. In other words, the Scribd document is someone's homework. Spot checks reveal that we've had some of the overlapping content since 2009, which strongly suggests that the student copied from Wikipedia rather than the other way around. Diannaa (talk) 14:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Then it is possible that the student has infringed on Wikipedia's copyright by putting the text under noncommercial conditions and not attributing the wiki. I wonder when one will need to state that content from this Wikipedia article is duplicated by someone else's article, like with this template. Just in case someone else uses Earwig's Copyvio Detector for the same article and has questions. CarlFilip19 (talk) 15:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that's a good idea. Please go ahead and add that template to the article's talk page. Thanks, Diannaa (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Sounds good. Thanks to both of you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

You are welcome, @Laterthanyouthink:, and thank you, @Diannaa:. The template has been added. CarlFilip19 (talk) 08:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)