Talk:Saint George's Cross

Flag of England and Wales?

This article says that St George's cross was officially adopted as the flag of England and Wales in 1277, but that's impossible since the English didn't have any jurisdiction in Wales untill 1282. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Æscing (talk • contribs) 09:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

• St. George's cross to St George's Cross. The article has the correct (non-punctuated) form (in British English, at least, the full stop is used to indicate that a word has been truncated after that point; thus 'St' is the correct abbreviation of 'saint', while 'St.' is the correct abbreviation of 'street'). Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:24, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation and sign your vote with ~~~~

Discussion

Add any additional comments

Despite what the article says "St George's Cross should not be confused with the Cross of St. George,..." I think the article should be move should be to "Cross of St George" as that seems to me to be more common, "St George's cross" has too many "s" es in it to be in as common a verbal usage. Philip Baird Shearer 14:36, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I agree — I just didn't want to be too radical on an issue on which I'm no expert. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:44, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Be radical. -- Philip Baird Shearer 11:27, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Cross of St George would be my choice. violet/riga (t) 14:44, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC) violet/riga (t) 15:15, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Does this count as consensus? Should I just make the move (assuming that I can)? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:52, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Actually wait a minute - Cross of St. George exists as a different article (about the Russian medal). Changing my vote to supporting a move to St George's cross. violet/riga (t) 15:15, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I'd personally prefer to keep this here with the full stop, like the rule about the dot only standing for truncated rules is not wholly followed in BE. However, if you really must, St George's cross will suffice.

Actually, shouldn't it be St George's Cross?

James F. (talk) 15:29, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If you are supporting or opposing this move then put it in the section above. My preference would be to move the page to Cross of St George (Common usage) and move the current article Cross of St. George to Cross of St George (Russian) as the vast majority of English language readers would not know of the Russian meaning but would known the Flag of England the crusaders, Richard the Lionheart (Papel banner), etc. (BTW there is also the Flag of Georgia (country)). Philip Baird Shearer 17:31, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Firstly, as this is now an (at least) five-way discussion, support/oppose votes make no real sense on a boolean choice.

Secondly, use of Georgia as an example is probably not the best idea - there's a very very very long-term yet still on-going discussion as to whether national items take precedence over sub-national ones (Georgia & Georgia (state) vs. Georgia (country) & Georgia vs. Georgia (country) & Georgia (state) vs. ...).

Finally, IME it's always called "the St. George's Cross"; "Cross of St. George" seems a rather rare usage, to me.

James F. (talk) 18:06, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I'd have said the reverse; is this regional? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:12, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Nah it's not regional, its sobriety. The more one has had to drink the harder it is to say "St. George's Cross" Philip Baird Shearer 23:13, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I know I'm picking up on a very, very old discussion. But it seems to me that "Cross of St George" is if anything more common than "St George's Cross". Google apparently prefers "Cross of St George" by a slim margin (117,000 to 71,000 as of a minute ago). Shouldn't the article at least state that the "Cross of St George" form is regularly used? Sakkura 12:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

French origin

I thought that it was the case that the St George's cross was adopted after one of the English Kings (forget which one) married Eleanor of Aquitaine. Previously the flag was used by the French kingdom of Aquitaine. GordyB 16:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

I would like to apose a thought, is the origin St Georges Cross actually from the Legend of the Dragon. In that St George slayed the dragon and drew a cross on its chest with blood from the tip of his sword. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dsando (talk • contribs) 00:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC) ====At first the red cross was the French badge at the time of the crusaders. What happened was that the English king was at once the legitimate king of France in the Hundred Years' War.

Early use

The "Early use" section is generally misleading. In the age of crusades there were no "English" or "French" knights. There were subjects of the Plantagenets or of the Capetians. The differences between noble knight from Orleans and from Mercia weren't more noticeable than between the same knight from Orleans and a one from Poitou. All of them spoke Middle French, their feudal lord was French and were know as "Franks" in levantian Outremer.

And of course there was no "English" knights in the ranks of first crusade. They were Frankish Normans of Robert Courtheuse, the duke of Normandy... Mroq (talk) 15:49, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

England v Scotland and Wales

The article refers to the fact that until recently English supporters would fly the British flag at football games, even against Scotland who share this flag, rather than their own flag. That has changed, but the English football authorities still play the British national anthem, which is sung by the English and booed by the Scots and Welsh who are also British. Talk about the "United" Kingdom! All caused because the English movement in the 1950's of booing the anthems of Scotland and Wales. Millbanks 07:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Mistakes

Be careful! "St George's Cross" and "White banner with a red cross" are NOT the same thing. In fact although the flag of Milan, Italy has the same appearance of the English one, it is not St George's but St Ambrose's cross FOTW.

Regarding the origins of the english flag, it is not sure that it came from the crusades. It is more likely that another hypotesis is correct: it came from the Republic of Genoa [1] , as admitted by the Duke of Kent in a flier for the British pavillion at the 1992 Expo in Genoa text here. 130.251.4.11 12:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

• So far as I know, at first the red cross was the badge for the French crusaders in Holy Land. As a result of the Hundred Years´War, the one-time French badge ended up being an English badge, among other things for the English King was the legitimate pretender to the French crown. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.2.203.76 (talk • contribs) 06:53, 17 November 2007

"Ancien Regime" Irish Regiments in French Service

The Irish foot regiments in French pay bore a red St George's cross on their regimental colours. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 19 October 2007

St George's Cross ban

How about including this piece of information?

FC Barcelona shirts sold in Saudi Arabia have had their emblems modified to exclude St George's Cross, included in the flag of the city of Barcelona. [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pichote (talk • contribs) 16:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Rightly or wrongly, it's been an issue elsewhere as well on several occasions, "Race fears spark St. George ban" Tuesday, October 4, 2005 "LONDON, England (CNN) -- British prison officers who wore a St. George's Cross tie-pin have been ticked off by the jails watchdog over concerns about the symbol's racist connotations." http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/10/04/britain.redcross/ also http://www.goal.com/en/news/9/england/2009/03/20/1166314/arsenal-ban-blackburn-rovers-fans-st-georges-cross and http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article248479.ece and http://express.lineone.net/posts/view/45503/Police-told-man-to-hide-racist-St-George-flag- (and a topic of discussion on Stormfront (website)). There's some mention of this at Flag_of_England#Far_Right. [3] appears to have additional stories. Coincidentally (?) it had been used or proposed as one of the Flags_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America#The_Battle_Flag, albeit a blue one (I don't know the significance of the blue) but had not been adopted so as not to offend Southern Jews, evidently. Шизомби (talk) 02:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:City of London Arms.png

The image Image:City of London Arms.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

montreal flag

can y'all add the city of montreal flag, which has the st george's cross, and a rose, shamrock, thistle, and a fleur du lis. Even the Province of Quebec includes the Cross. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.1.45 (talk) 05:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Provincial flags

We have that Australian flag here, so does anyone think we should have the flag of Alberta? It apparently contains the Cross of St. George in it's coat of arms.

Byzantine Empire

The St George's Cross figures into Byzantine Heraldry, probably brought to the East by the Western Crusades c.1340. Possibly a sub-section or link to the article Byzantine Heraldry is appropriate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebastapolis (talk • contribs) 12:16, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Just a query - in the text it states that a St. Georges Cross is a red cross on a white background , yet in the gallery there is white cross on a blue background ( Greece ) is that still a St. George Cross ? Lejon (talk) 08:20, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Greek Flag?

I am not really sure about Greek Flag's relation with St.George's Cross. Specifically:

• The colours are different
• There is no such mention, of that, neither in the English nor Greek wikipedia page.
• There is not a reference, an external link or a note neither concerning nor supporting the Greek Flag-St.George's Cross relation.

--Almanakos (talk) 13:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

(Sorry for replying to an old post)

That's entirely appropriate after six weeks, even six years. -P64

I just want to point out, the OP’s second bullet point to help push through his idea is wrong. A general wiki philosophy is that an article on something always intended to be expanded upon. If some information is missing from a Wikipedia (getting less general now), then it is assumed it may be correct and may be edited in at a later date. I cannot recall the name of this principle of Wikipedia to link to it, though.

Anyway, I personally think that there should be some sort of set of rules for picking lookalikes. The Greek flag has the same symbolism (St George) so it should stay, but some of these lookalike sections in other articles are bordering on the ridiculous. For instance, if I recall correctly, there used to be a wholly separate article on flags that looked like the US flag because the metric used (the editor’s eye, that is) was so wide, that even the flag of Uruguay was listed. Unless the symbolism is the same, then no lookalike sections should exist in any articles on any flags, be they national flags or else. A WikiProject needs to address this problem, I believe. --Γιάννης Α. ^✆|☑ 20:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Well, if the Greek flag is suitable, then why not Swedish, Danish or Finnish? Greek is blue-white, Swedish blue-yellow, Danish red-white and Finnish white-blue, though the crosses in the Swedish and Danish are slightly narrower. And where exactly is the explanation of the inclusion of that Greek flag? 82.141.119.19 (talk) 04:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

The article states: "St George's Cross (or the Cross of St George) is a red cross on a white background". This isn't the case with Greece. I am deleting it unless anyone has a real reason not to. Cls14 (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

I agree that some more explanation is needed to support what Cls14 has deleted from the lead section. The lead sentence isn't decisive, however. [a] The article covers another meaning in St George's cross#Nordic countries. [b] Quoting Johnanth (above), "The Greek flag has the same symbolism (St George) so it should stay ...". If that is true then Greece should be included with explanation and reference.

Case [a] is enough to need some revision of the lead section.

See also my -06-13 contribution below, #Reorganize Georgia (country) and Europe. --P64 (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Byzantine Genoa

Genoa was the capital town of the province named "Provincia Maritima Italorum" under the Byzantine domain (544).

The Byzantine soldiers built a church dedicated to Saint George (their patron saint) where any year they went to pay homage to heir gonfalon, maybe just a red cross on a white field.

The cult of Saint George remained also after the defeat of byzantines in the region (644).

3 centuries after the emperor recognized the rights of customary and dominatin on the Riviera to Genoa (958) of 947 is the first document that quotes the church.

p.s. isn't wrong genoan, i've always heard genoese —Preceding unsigned comment added by F.noceti (talk • contribs) 20:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

offending the Genovesi

I removed this new paragraph:

This privilege was given by the city of Genoa to Richard II at the start of the third Crusade with the understanding to be used only by navy fleet, just look at the navy flag of today, but not to the army wich can only fly the union Jack. For this reasons is as been try to ban this flag by member of parlament, with the terrible outcry from the Sun newspaper an general public. The sportin of this flag at football match is an insult to the people of Genova proud of the flag since 800 ad. (Paolo lubrano-Lavadera)

There's room in the section "Alleged Genoan origin" for a mention that (some) people of Genova take offense at English use of the flag, if it can be better written and sourced. —Tamfang (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

And I reverted this passage added to the opening:

In the Middle Ages, St George flag was the main symbol of Crusaders, the armed pilgrims to Jerusalem. St George flag was in earlier times used by the Republic of Genoa and probably derives from the times (VI century A.D.) when Genoa was a Byzantine garrison before the year 1000. The symbol used to be brought in the small Genoese church of Saint George in Genoa as a symbol of devotion and is documented as of 1096.

In 1190 London asked and obtained the possibility of using the Saint George cross to obtain protection of its crusaders army from the mighty naval army of Genoa, which in those days was one of the main naval armies in the Mediterranean and Black Sea. This allowed protection to the English and London army from Saracens and pirates in the Mediterranean. In exchange for this protection, the king of England paid to the Dux of Genoa an annual tribute. As of today, England, London and the Royal Navy use St George flag.

Some of this could be added to "Alleged Genoan origin" (should that section be retitled?), and some is already there; at any rate it does not fit well in the lead section. —Tamfang (talk) 05:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Georgia's flag in the 5th century?

The statement that Georgia had St George's cross as its flag in the 5th (!) century is odd and seems to be a nationalistic myth. Were national flags in those times at all? Page 54 of Dowling's Sketches refers to nothing.--Luboslov Yezykin (talk) 12:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

SGC in other European countries

From the article lead [unchanged]:
> St George's Cross has been adopted on the coat of arms and flags of several countries and cities which have St George as a patron saint, notably Georgia, England, Aragon, Greece, Genoa and Barcelona.

Heading and lead sentence of section two, following a long section one devoted to England [previous version]:
>St George's Cross in other European countries
> Saint George is the patron saint of England, Catalonia, Aragon and of various other countries and regions.

Are there sovereign states other than Georgia (country) and Greece (Hellenic Republic) with St George as patron? If so, are there any others in Europe? If so, they should be named here with Georgia and Greece.

For now I have promoted Georgia (with a link to its own section) and Greece by name only. The section lead now alludes to England by "also" and relegates Catalonia, Aragon to the "others" [as revised]:
> Saint George is also the patron saint of Georgia (below), Greece, and various European regions or cities. The flag of Georgia accompanies the Cross by four small red crosses (below) and it used in the flags of two other European countries.

Someone should say a word or three about those other countries.

Otherwise I have rearranged the section heavily, both for sentence and link structure and for geographical grouping. Some hidden comments may be useful prompts for a next editor who knows more. --P64 (talk) 16:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Reorganize Georgia (country) and Europe

This hour I have rewritten section SGC in other European countries, where further rewrite may be welcome (see above).

Regarding Georgia (country), however, this new structure now seems appropriate to me.

(lead)

1 St George's Cross in England

• 1.1 Crusades
• 1.2 Genoan origin
• 1.3 Middle Ages
• 1.4 Modern usage

2 St George's Cross in Georgia [up two sections]

3 St George's Cross in other European countries (down one but incorporating old sections 6 and 7 as subsections)

• 6 St George's Cross in Sardinia
• 7 St George's Cross in Sweden [relate "centred cross" and "greek cross" mentioned previously]

4 St George's Cross in the United States

5 St George's Cross in New South Wales

6-9 [renumber 8-11; perhaps organize the Gallery by some principle]

--P64 (talk) 17:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Off-color crosses. There has been some change in the Gallery section alone, User: Cplakidas deleting all crosses in colors other than red on white except Army of the Breton Duchy, black on white. Greece is a prominent one deleted.

Patronages of SG. There are so many Patronages of Saint George, I wonder whether they are individually notable here, or only as a group, essentially "Many of the Patronages of SG use the SGC cross symbolically". Those patronages named here should, perhaps, be precisely those whose use of SGC is covered here.

• Malta. SGC is not to be confused with George Cross, the UK decoration, but the latter design incorporates St George and the dragon. Where it does in turn appear on the national flag, namely Malta (Patronages of Saint George#Malta), that should somehow be included here.

--P64 (talk) 18:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

FOTW, WP:RS

Could people PLEASE stop using FOTW as an authoritative source unthinkingly? FOTW is a community-driven site just like Wikipedia. It has excellent users, and these can be identified by the fact that they CITE THEIR SOURCES. So by all means use FOTW to locate your sources, and then CITE the sources used at FOTW. If the FOTW comment you would like to use does not happen to cite its source, well, don't use it. --dab (𒁳) 08:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Historical development

In heraldic topics, it is very easy to get things backward if you are not very careful. I say this because Wikipedia is riddled with mistakes in heraldry, and I have basically come to expect this of any new heraldic article I approach. This one is no different. I assume that for most editors, heraldry and flags aren't concerns in their own right, and they are happy to just tag "medieval" on pretty much anything and leave it at that.

Ok, now I have had my say, the development of "St. George's Cross" seems to have been as follows:

• the cross was of course as a field sign since the 5th century. it may also incidentially have been red-on-white at times. You can describe this as "St. George's Cross" in modern terminology, but only if it is made clear that this wasn't what the cross was known or intended as at the time
• The Crusades. In the 12th century a cross meant "I am on a crusade", it did not represent any state or polity. But from the mid-to-late 12th century, the cross was shown in distinct colours to identify the origin of the wearer. This is the starting-point of heraldry itsef.
• The red cross (not necessarily on white) was associated with the Templars, with the Spaniards, and later with the French. I have seen no evidence that it was associated with Saint George in either the 12th or 13th century, or even the 14th.
• Saint George is depicted as a "Christian knight", naturally wearing a cross, beginning about 1200, i.e. still during the Crusades. He is not wearing "his" cross, he is being a crusader (sometimes "a Templar"?)
• The fashion of attributed arms is a 15th century thing (perhaps late 14th?) Now, George begins to use his own flag, and this happens to become fixed as a red-on-white cross from about the 1430s(?) in Italy, France, Spain, Germany and England.

The question remains, when and by what mechanism did St. George become associated with this particular cross? It is possible that he was the patron saint of a polity which just happened to have chosen red-on-white as their emblem/flag in the 13th century, perhaps Genoa, but we need sources on that. Sadly, Wikipedia coverage of the topic is completely corrupted by the spread across articles of a quote lifted from Francobampi.it attributed HRH The Duke of Kent. Why people would do something like this when they have google books and archive.org at their fingertips is a mystery to me, but that's how it is and I'll try to fix it. --dab (𒁳) 10:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

What would be interesting, and what is lacking in the current article, is a study of the history of the term Danebrog. The Order of the Dannebrog was established 1660. This seems to have been the term of the Danish war flag since the 15th or 15th century. Now, rigsflag does not mean "national flag" in this historical context. Rigsflag equates German Reichsbanner, and it was a term for the war flag. We do not call the Reichsbanner the "national flag of Germany" in the 13th century, and for good reason. It is entirely a modern development that Denmark happened to pick its historical war flag as national flag, and Germany didn't. This modern development does not prejudice the status of these flags in pre-modern times. --dab (𒁳) 12:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

ok, so it turns out that there was no connection between the red cross and St George in Genoa until at least the 1280s, if ever. It is possible that this association is in fact English and arose at some point during the 1270s and the 1340s. Perrin isn't sure on this point and I haven't found any better references so far. The timeline to be studied further is thus limited to c. 1270 to 1430:

• by 1270, the red cross was used as an emblem by English troops (not as a flag but worn by soldiers). It may or may not have become associated with St George from this time
• in England, the red cross and the saint became most likely associated under Edward III (1340s), but do we have a source explicitly saying so?
• the saint is shown as using this flag, surcoat or shield design in paintings across Western Europe (at least Germany, France, Spain) from about the 1430s.

Thus it is plausible that the idea, concept or term of "St Georges Cross" first arose at some point in the 14th century, but more research would be welcome. --dab (𒁳) 13:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

• 
  HIC NUNTIATUM EST VVILLELM(O) DE HAROLD
• 
  From Companions of William the Conqueror

From Companions of William the Conqueror "This knight depicted in the Bayeux Tapestry (detail of above) appears below the marginal legend E[...]tius, a Latinised version of Eustace. He has therefore been identified as Eustace, Count of Boulogne. His finger pointing to Duke William seems to depict his urging the Duke to retreat, as the account in William of Poitiers relates. However, others state the figure to be Turstin FitzRolf, due to its carrying of a standard depicting a cross, apparently the Papal Banner. Turstin was described as having carried the 'Standard of the Normans' by Orderic Vitalis"

Lucien Musset in The Bayeux Tapestry iv makes the point that crosses on banners are all over the Tapestry one or more of them may represent the papal banner.

That William is holding a cross in the first scene depicted above may be significant, as it may indicate that he is on a "mission from God". If so then the link between the English monarchy and cross on a banner may date from that time. -- PBS (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

"Richard the Lionheart" myth

I think I traced the story of this now. The "urban legend" itself predates 1900, I found it mentioned in 1891. Of course it is never referenced to a primary source, and never in expert literature, but always in a colloquial "as everyone knows" setting. Perrin 1922 is aware of this as a "common belief" and explicitly states that there is no substantiation for it. The only thing left would be to research when the claim is first attested.

Now the "Duke of Kent" version I had to remove from like ten places on Wikipedia. Apparently the Duke of Kent (or his ghostwriter) really wrote this in a brochure intended for the 1992 Columbus exhibition in Genoa. Needless to say, this also wasn't referenced, it was just a nice thing to say to the Genoese. 1992 is a long time ago now, and this brochure would have been forgotten, had it not been unearthed by an Italian outfit known as the "Ligurian Independence Movement" and posted online. Then one guy, Filipo Noceti, posted it on FOTW. I looked at Noceti's contributions to FOTW, and he is always claiming stuff off the top of his head with no references, far below the par on that website. This time his "reference" was the "Ligurian" page about the Duke of Kent's brochure, accurate enough as long as it is treated as referencing the claim made in 1992, and not actual medieval history.

Then from FOTW this was copied to Wikipedia. There seems to be some unwritten rule on the wiki that whatever people copy-paste from FOTW passes under the radar. Wikipedia then helped perpetuate this thing, and it is as of now found repeated verbatim on some 200 place on the internet. [4] It was high time to fix this, another instance of Wikipedia "creating" historical truth (aka Citogenesis). --dab (𒁳) 13:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Four claims in one unsourced sentence

I have removed the following sentence because it contains several "facts" that are unsubstantiated and need inline citations to support them:

"Unknown to the majority of the British public, the flag was "borrowed" from the Genoese Fleet. The reasoning was that the Genoese fleet was very powerful and it meant that it would deter pirates from attacking ships with the flag."

1. who says it is "Unknown to the majority of the British public"?
2. who says it was borrowed from the Genoese fleet
3. who says the Genoese fleet was very powerful
4. who says it would deter pirates from attacking British ships?

This removal to the talk page constitutes a challenge and WP:CHALLENGE states "Attribute all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged to a reliable, published source using an inline citation".

-- PBS (talk) 16:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 22 March 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) Yashovardhan (talk) 13:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

---

Saint George's Cross → St. George's Cross –

• I may have made a mistake with the Saint George's Cross move, St. (or St) looks to be the common n-gram name]. The way I looked at it was that it was Saint George's cross, referring to the individual who is the namesake of the cross, and missed that it seems to be a proper name. I was going with MOS:SAINTS on this and missing that it was a proper name. My apologies. Then again, would MOS:SAINTS apply, and negate the common name policy, thus rendering the page name Saint George's cross, lower-case 'c'? Maybe, but probably not. (EDIT a few minutes later: Well, maybe. Lower-case "c" is a red-link but maybe it's accurate] Randy Kryn 00:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
• Nope, St. George's Cross seems correct. At MOS:SAINTS I just added the subsection "Cities and all other entities named after saints" by removing the last sentence from the subsection "Buildings named after saints", where I had missed it. 'Cities and all other entities' is quite a bit more inclusive than 'Buildings', so at least that clarification came from my mistake. Randy Kryn 00:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
• @Randy Kryn: Queried move request transferred from my user talk page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Randy Kryn:, just to clarify, you are saying that you want this moved back to St. George's Cross? I'll close this as an uncontested reversal of the previous move, but just wanted to be clear that is what you wanted done. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Neutral, and since nobody else has yet commented on this page, maybe keep it open and even relist it to see what others think and guideline policy they can offer. According to MOS:SAINTS this could be a proper name because it's about a topic tangential to the Saint George page. It's about his ceremonial day. Although if you take it as 'Saint George's' Day, then it should be 'Saint'. Maybe Saint Patrick's Day is a precedent which changes all 'Saint Day' names to 'Saint'. Further discussion might convince me one way or another, but for now I'm neutral but leaning toward the traditional at times and site consistency and 'reads better as 'Saint' at others. Randy Kryn 16:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Glad I asked, I wasn't sure what you were advocating here, so wanted to check. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Saint George's cross isn't really a commercial or personal name or so. Therefore, logically, it should follow the "Saint" proper policy as per MOS:SAINTS. Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

• Support but it is an interesting one. For people we use Saint, but for buildings St.. I think that being inanimate and named after the Saint, it's closer to the building. Interested in other views. Andrewa (talk) 12:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose: per WP:CONSISTENCY as the "'s" in "Saint George's" is a possessive we should use the full name as is used on the Saint George article, which is also what we do at Saint George's Day. Also, and this really is just a personal opinion, I think that the other formulation, the 'Cross of Saint George', would look odd if written as the 'Cross of St George' but that's probably just me. Really this whole debate is more an issue of preference rather than policy. Ebonelm (talk) 23:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose. Better to avoid choosing between St. and St since this isn't a paper encyclopedia. Srnec (talk) 03:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
• Rename back to St George's Cross. What was wrong with it before? The common name is abbreviated and this was its form. Per WP:ENGVAR that is therefore where it should remain. Where is the mandate to move it from the common British version to the common American version via a version that almost nobody uses? Because at the moment this just looks like a sneaky way to change the variety of English in which it's titled. I'm sure it's not, but that's how it looks. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

No, not a sneaky anything or other, just noticed the "'s" at the end and thought it was 'Saint' because it was attributed to an individual. Probably should go back to 'St.' per common name, but no deception intended. Randy Kryn 17:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Common name in the USA. Not common name in the Commonwealth. Read WP:ENGVAR. We do not move articles titled or written in one variety of English to another variety of English unless there is a close connection with that country. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

• Support move: St George's cross or St. George;s cross are much more widely used than Saint George's cross — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose move for previously mentioned reasons. Chicbyaccident (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose, to keep consistent with the parent article, Saint George, like Saint George's Day. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Ethiopian-Eritrean cross 1.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)