Talk:Adam Sedgwick

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology High‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Adam Sedgwick is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles

[Untitled]

An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Adam_Sedgwick article:

Can link geological timescale: ...rn [[geology]]. He proposed the [[Devonian period]] of the geological timescale and later the [[Cambrian]] period. The latter proposal was...
Can link rock strata: ... proposal was based on work which he did on [[Wales|Welsh]] rock strata....

Additionally, there are some other articles which may be able to linked to this one (also known as "backlinks"):

In Genetics, can backlink Adam Sedgwick: ...[William Bateson]] coins the term "genetics" in a letter to Adam Sedgwick...

Notes: The article text has not been changed in any way; Some of these suggestions may be wrong, some may be right.
Feedback: I like it, I hate it, Please don't link to — LinkBot 11:32, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Cleanup

This article was tagged as needing expert attention but I can't identify why. The editor who tagged it is retired. I will attempt a cleanup and remove tag unless there are any specific problems that are identified as beyond my generalist capabilities.Cutler 22:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As it stands now the flag seems not necessary: the article contains plenty of reliably referenced material. I'm taking it out. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two Sedwicks

Just to put minds at rest, there were two British Adam Sedgwicks in natural science! The subject of this article was Old Adam, whereas the other was Young Adam. Young Adam was a distant relative, grand-nephew-ish. Any references in letters after 1873 must be to young Adam Sedgwick, zoologist, 1854--1913. OK? Macdonald-ross (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ephemera or worth mentioning?

Philip Henry Gosse used Sedgwick, alongside Lyell, as a target in his notorious work Omphalos (1857), in which he unsuccessfully attempted to "untie the geological knot" by reconciling old earth creationism with studies suggesting the earth was much older than previously thought. Admittedly much of Gosse's criticism veers towards personal attack rather than anything constructive, but there are several passages where he attempts to evaluate the "flaws" with Sedgwick's own work. Anybody feel it's worth mentioning, or is it too minor a detail for inclusion? Absurdtrousers (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Article!

Sedgwick was one of the most important of the early geologists, and it is patently absurd to devote almost the entirety of the article to his opposition to evolution.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Sedgwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110620214431/http://1911encyclopedia.org/ to http://1911encyclopedia.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Sedgwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221221829/http://www.amphilsoc.org/mole/view?docId=ead%2FMss.B.Se25L-ead.xml%3Bquery%3D%3Bbrand%3Ddefault to http://www.amphilsoc.org/mole/view?docId=ead%2FMss.B.Se25L-ead.xml%3Bquery%3D%3Bbrand%3Ddefault

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]