Jump to content

Talk:111 (emergency telephone number)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redundancy

[edit]

The section titled Recent controversy should really be included in the New Zealand Police article and not the article on 1-1-1 as the issues relate to the performance of the NZ Police's Communications Centres that answers calls directed to Police that were placed via the 111 service. The issue is wider than the 111 service to Police and other emergency services that provide services using the 111 system are not affected by this controversy. -- Cameron Dewe 02:36, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. Go ahead and move them, and add a communications stub to this article. Falcon 03:07, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Moved and summary of relevant recommendation added. -- Cameron Dewe 09:08, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

112 ?

[edit]

Does the GSM 112 number work? SimonLyall 8 July 2005 00:17 (UTC)

That is a universal GSM standard. Falcon 20:03, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

111 UK ?

[edit]

Should information about the piloted 111 service in the UK [1] be added to this page? Chris4uk (talk) 23:53, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's already another article about this at NHS 111 (England). Mhiji (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax calls

[edit]

What is described as the first hoax call may not have been a hoax at all - more like a misunderstanding of the purpose of the number. What was the first hoax- in the sense of a fake call for assistance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 06:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 111 (emergency telephone number). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:111_(emergency_telephone_number)&oldid=1195344298"