Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted the Caver

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 15:00, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ted the Caver

Do we need this...um..."memecruft"? Grutness...wha? 02:36, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What exactly is your reason for wanting it deleted? It is a story that has been passed along online since 2002, a bit more information would be great, which could happen. --JE 03:22, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Where shall I start? Will "non-notable" do? How about "Un-encyclopaedic"? Grutness...wha? 01:27, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You should have put that first, though, instead of just labelling it 'cruft'! Sonic Mew 14:44, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

Well, being as I'm new to Wikipedia's policies, I'll agree it wasn't very "encyclopaedic". I dislike being flammed, though.--JE 22:34, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"Cruft" is by definition non-notable. Delete. — Phil Welch 22:20, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Me too - so it's a good thing that no-one was. Grutness...wha? 07:19, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

247 Google hits. Delete as non-notable. --Idont Havaname 03:52, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Notability not established. --Tabor 03:54, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete non notable. JamesBurns 04:35, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete: Memorial to a dead mass-forwarded story. Perhaps it could be found on Snopes, but it oughtn't be found here. Non-encyclopedic. Geogre 12:11, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete As above, not 'cruft', but not notable or encyclopaedic Sonic Mew 14:44, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Notability not established. carmeld1 16:38, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.