Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Avala/Proposed decision
Why has one single article been picked out here? I hope these aren't going to be the only findings. Ambi 23:48, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- I just started with the first one and worked through it. I'll try to get to the others. Fred Bauder 23:53, Aug 19, 2004 (UTC)
In response to the question about what closure...
I would ask, as I did when I first brought this case, for something along the lines of Anthony's parole against "controversial" edits. Snowspinner 23:17, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)
I have to say, I'm very disappointed with the motion to close here, as it seems not to come so much out of a deadlock or out of a failure to find any conduct that can be considered at fault, so much as out of a failure to actually get onto the remedies and enforcement stage of things for months. Snowspinner 16:47, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
- I agree. While there mightn't be likely to be the most severe of consequences, the findings of fact would suggest that at least something is deserved. Ambi 22:40, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Being told to follow the same policy as everyone else...for a month? Strange. Ambi 02:50, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Avala/Proposed decision page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Avala/Proposed decision" page.
