User talk:UltraSkuzzi
Image copyright problem with Image:Downtown-akron.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Downtown-akron.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.
CARTOONS OF MOHAMMED
[edit]Showing the figures of Mohammed is disturbing muslims. And it is a insult to Islam. In Islam making and also looking the figures of Mohammed is forbidden.That is raping the holy things of Islam.And it is not about "freedom".PLEASE get back your sıgnature.Thanks.--Erdemsenol 01:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
From User talk:Erdemsenol
[edit]This isn't the middle east, and it never will be. We don't cower out when someone gets offended by something. Hell, I've seen a lot of the media in the middle east, and they have no problem mocking Jews and Christians. I guess Allah blesses that. The hypocrisy is unbelievable. You act like we single out the bad Muslims, but this proves that you're all the same. There will never be a tolerant strain in Islam because the religion is so monolithic and unchangeable. Why is pictures of your prophet so offensive? No one bothers to explain this. And 'because it is against Islam is not a valid reply. --UltraSkuzzi 02:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- I guess Allah blesses that...You act like we single out the bad Muslims, but this proves that you're all the same. There will never be a tolerant strain in Islam because the religion is so monolithic and unchangeable. UltraSkuzzi, note Wikipedia:Civility. The reason portraying the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is so offensive is that Islam prohibits shirk, associating another god with the one god, Allah. In fact, this is stated in the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy article:
- Islamic tradition bans any depiction of the prophets either in drawing or statues, even respectful ones, out of concern that such images could lead to idolatry, and thus worshipping of Muhammad instead of the One God.
- May Allah bless you in this world and the Hereafter. joturner 02:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
If the issue is concern that someone might be lead to idolatry (in a world that is full of idolatry of other things), EXTREME OUTRAGE over the usage of one particular source of idolatry is evidence that that source (Mohammed even) is idolized by those who are outraged. --Go figure!
YOU NEED A MAP
[edit]IF HAVE YOU GOOGLE EART,PLEASE LOOK AT THE TURKEY FROM SATALITE.YOU ARE WORKING HELP DESK OF COLLEGE AND INTERESTING POLITIC.
YOU DONT KNOW WHERE IS TURKEY?
REPUBLIC OF TURKEY İS A SECULAR COUNTRY. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erdemsenol (talk • contribs)
- - What does that have to do with anything? America is a capitalist country and we have plenty of socialists. Turkey is a secular society in name only. The Islamists already have their footing in the government, it's just a matter of time before they start enforcing shar'ia law, and then you won't have to worry about these cartoons because they'll be censored by the benevolent government. Good going mate. --UltraSkuzzi 02:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Erdemsenol, note Civility. Calm down. And looking at a map won't tell you whether a country is democratic or secular (although Turkey is). joturner 02:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
I hope you wont be a politician(same mind as Bush)Why Muslıms(99%) dont lıke USA?
Who plenty America plenty of socialist or 3.th world and stupıd arabıc polıtıcians plenty USA?
Have you tought thıs ? Why US Army didnt win a war?Because you suppose USA ıs the world,dont you?
You are suıcıde slowly with thıs mınd all of the world.İn the future nobody go outsıde from america.Because you are seızed with fear.--Erdemsenol 03:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
I have no clue what you have said, and even if I did, it would probably be incoherent and easily rebutted. We won World War II, I know that's a travesty to you, because Hitler should have “finished the job” with the jews. And you have no clue what the situation in America is. We are not holding you down, you are holding yourself down with this illogical, dark age religion. --UltraSkuzzi 03:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
You apall the holy prophed of your as you say "Illogical". HTitler was incorrect as his killing many innocent people , you can not say he was Right you isnsult us all ith compare us to him. Bleessd to you in your life. The US President eye is CIRCLE!!! Faucett 06:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
"do you sell PAL cameras here?"
World War II
[edit]We didnt kıll American Indian, they are still lıvıng on cottages and there isnt Ku KLUX KLAN in Turkey and Muslıms didint kill negros.
1.You didnt won, Hitler lost
2.Vietnam,Korea,Somali,Kuba and ... You are just yelling
3.Islam's mean in arabıc selamis mean Peace
4.You have no clue what is Islam and muslıms
5.Real dark age beliefs are your minds
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Erdemsenol (talk • contribs)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:ClevelandCityFlag.jpg)
[edit]
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:ClevelandCityFlag.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 10:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Image Tagging Image:MF dam.jpg
[edit]
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:MF dam.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 03:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Re: Ohio Shields
[edit]My plan was to do them as I go, but the more and more I read that I understand why it would be better to do them all at once. When you said you wanted to do the Ohio State Highway 59 article, what did you mean (just for clarification)? Micheal 19:24, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Akron Beacon Journal
[edit]Congratulations on your appearance in the Akron Beacon Journal article about Wikipedia on July 27, 2006! DangApricot 04:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Also on the Innerbelt article on August 4. (July 27th's) Mapsax 23:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Final state highway naming conventions debate
[edit]UltraSkuzzi, your participation is welcome in the Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll. Please give your input as to the process by 23:59 UTC on August 8.
Regards, physicq210 02:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Ohio State Highway WikiProject
[edit]Hello, I’ve proposed some changes to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Ohio State Highways – please see the discussion on the talk page. Your feedback is greatly appreciated. Regards, Homefryes 16:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
You're an expert Java Programmeur? Wikiwiki1950 Go to my user page and add your name to the list
RE: Akron Roads
[edit]I've added the articles I've created to my user page. Yes, I do live in the Akron area, and thanks for the message!
Regards, MilkTaco 06:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:1985-canton-highways.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:1985-canton-highways.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- was that going to use 43 as a Spur or something? that would have been a good Idea back then. Meh they still haven't upgraded 30 to the county line yet. they are rather slow
Captainkang 07:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Image:Downtown-akron.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Downtown-akron.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ccwaters 16:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Do you have proof that Stark County has "irrevocably released all rights" to that image? ccwaters 20:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
   The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
| Volume 1, Issue 1 | 10 February 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. V60 VTalk · VDemolitions 20:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #2
[edit]
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
Apologies for the late delivery. Filling in for Vishwin60: Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
| Volume 1, Issue 3 | 10 March 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
Active user verification
[edit]Hello, UltraSkuzzi. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:USRD, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list and off the respective road projects as well. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. V60 VTalk · VDemolitions 20:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
U.S. Roads Inactivity notification
[edit]You have been declared an inactive user and your name will be removed from the newsletter distribution and the projects you were a member of. If this is in error, please contact me on my talk page. Do not restore your name to the list. Regards, Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Your edits to Akron, Ohio
[edit]are mispelled. Your edits have been rolled back. —Coastergeekperson04's talk@ 21:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:AkronCityFlag.jpg
[edit]
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AkronCityFlag.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:AkronCitySeal.gif
[edit]This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AkronCitySeal.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Kent-thoroughfare.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kent-thoroughfare.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
[edit]
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)