Jump to content

Talk:Afro–Latin Americans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Andrews, 2004

[edit]
  • Andrews, George Reid (2004). Afro-Latin America, 1800–2000. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-515232-6. OL 3689139M.

This book is free to read at Open Library. Could be useful for building the article. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues and classification

[edit]
The article has several issues including: 1)- failed verification (December 2010), 2)- unsourced statements (June 2011, October 2015, December 2015, February 2016, January 2021, 3)- needing page number citations (October 2015), and 4)- needing additional references (February 2023)
The criteria #1 states; The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited., and #4, The article is reasonably well-written.
Reassess article to C-class.
[edit]
There are twenty entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
  • WP:ELCITE: ...access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.
  • WP:ELBURDEN: Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them.
Note: moved from article "External links" as possible future references