Talk:The Perfect Storm (book)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Perfect Storm (book) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
quote from amazon.com review
[edit]I think that quoted text is actually from the book. I'll try to check today... It might have been quoted from the book into review...
Also, I don't know if you know, but Linda Greenlaw wrote a couple books about fishing, and earned her own entry ->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Greenlaw —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.181.24 (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Book controversy
[edit]The "Book controversy" section says "While there have been disputes over the context and research of the book, there have been controversies that surround the movie The Perfect Storm." Firstly, the sentence doesn't make sense - should it say "While there have been no disputes over the context and research of the book, there have been controversies that surround the movie The Perfect Storm" or "While there have been disputes over the context and research of the book, there have also been controversies that surround the movie The Perfect Storm"?
If there have been controversies about the book, why aren't they alluded to? What does it mean to have a controversy about the "context" of a book? Can someone make sense of this puzzling statement? Sadiemonster (talk) 03:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)