Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fat cat
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 20:11, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dictionary definition, unlikely to become more
- (nomination by Jemiller226)
- (this new vfd system makes it easy to forget to sign)
- Delete dicdef —Wahoofive (Talk) 05:12, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect - to Fat Cat, which is (or was) a character on Australian childrens television, but is currently an article on Chip 'n Dale. - Longhair | Talk 09:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - this term has substantial history behind it. The concept appears frequently in culture and commentary - there is significant potential for expansion here.
- The above vote is by Pioneer-12, at 10:09, 2005 May 1 (sometimes I forget to sign 'em too). --BD thimk 02:35, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
- btw, Keep - over a million google hits, interesting history of use. --BD thimk 02:35, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
- I'm going to reverse course from my nomination in light of some additions and suggest now to keep but disambig with the aforementioned children's television character. I still think it needs expansion, though. --Jemiller226 06:05, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Rich cats Klonimus 01:07, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.