Talk:Wizards Play Network

Text and/or other creative content from DCI (Wizards of the Coast) was copied or moved into Magic: The Gathering Organized Play with this edit on 18:42, 4 May 2019. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Name of article

The DCI is technically known simply as the DCI, not the Duelists' Convocation International. From the DCI Universal Tournament Rules (UTR): DCI: Organization dedicated to developing and maintaining tournament structures for trading card and miniatures games. Formerly an acronym for Duelists' Convocation International, the name is now simply the DCI.

Can the title of this page be changed to DCI? If so, I (or someone else) could add comments explaining that the DCI did once stand for Duelists' Convocation International. fsufezzik 21:01, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

Normally, I'd agree. Unfortunately DCI is already taken (with a disambiguation page), and that acronym is used by many other organizations. That means, if we were to rename this article, we'd have to make it parenthetical. Something like DCI (Wizards of the Coast) or DCI (Magic: The Gathering). Neither of those sounds like the right way to go. I say we keep it as it is, and make sure it's very clear in the first paragraph. -- Netoholic @ 21:50, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)

Good fix - thanks! -- fsufezzik 19:22, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)

My preference would be DCI (Wizards of the Coast), even though it appears a bit clumsy. After all, DCI is the 'real name' now, not Duelists' Convocation International (which should, naturally, still redirect to that DCI page).

There is actually a precedent of this. A band formerly known as DAD, which stood for 'Disneyland after Dark', long time ago changed its name to DAD, which doesn't stand for anything. This was due to a lawsuit from Disney. Their Wikipedia article is titled D-A-D and they are linked from the DAD disambiguation page. The spelling D-A-D is, I think, a bit artificial, because I've seen them also credited as D.A.D. (for instance Amazon record store) and DAD. They could as well just be DAD_(rock_band) or something.

Thus, I'd sleep better with the article moved to DCI_(something). Not going to lose sleep if it isn't moved, though. These three paragrapsh are signed by: 130.231.89.99 10:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC) Matti Nuortio, Oulu, Finland[reply]

Yeah... having the page titled "Duelists' Convocation International" and the first sentence of the article be "DCI (formerly known as the Duelists' Convocation International)" is more than a bit clumsy. I think retitling the page makes sense. 63.163.61.3 19:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magic-centric

This article is very centered on Magic: the Gathering, but the DCI also sanctions other Wizards of the Coast and Avalon Hill games. Seems like that ought to be mentioned somewhere, and maybe the high-level Magic events ought to be somewhere on their own. --PeterCooperJr 14:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I'll look into this. Stifle 19:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two-Headed Giant Format

This has become increasingly more prominent in tournaments (it's a new format). Can someone include this in the MTG section?

Definitely yes. There will be a Magic Two-Headed Giant Pro Tour soon. 130.231.89.99 10:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC) Matti Nuortio, Oulu, Finland[reply]

Look at Me!

Should it be mentioned towards the end of the article that the DCI - in a way - has their own 'commemorative' Magic card: Look at Me, I'm the DCI? This could be a trivia section like entry or something. 130.231.89.99 10:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC) Matti Nuortio, Oulu, Finland[reply]

You're right, except Wikipedia is trying to eliminate Trivia sections. IF there's a way to fit it in without having to insert a trivia section by all means put it in. --Kpsi355 (talk) 02:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Magic grandprix logo.jpg

Image:Magic grandprix logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Magic protour logo.jpg

Image:Magic protour logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Magic worlds logo.jpg

Image:Magic worlds logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Judge Program

Just added a section about the judge program. While the content is fine the writing might be nicer. Somebody more capable than me should take a look at it and improve it. Thanks, OdinFK (talk) 13:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I think the Judge (Magic: The Gathering) page should be merged into this site. Most of the information is covered here anyway and this page is not so crowded as to require a spinoff. Thematically it belongs here as well. OdinFK (talk) 08:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitational cards

I don't know if Pikula won Invitational before Finkel or not, but I'm pretty sure that Meddling Mage is from Jon Finkel and Shadowmage Infiltrator is from Chris Pikula. I corrected it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.20.81.152 (talk) 07:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true and somebody has also correctly changed it back already. Thanks for your help anyway. OdinFK (talk) 12:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References to tournament policy documents

In the new section about rankings are a couple of links to tournament policy documents. Unfortunately the linked documents are replaced with newer versions from time to time. If anybody knows a place where the older versions can be accessed, then it would be helpful to replace the links I gave with those more static versions. OdinFK (talk) 12:02, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elo Rating

Magic hasn't used Elo Rating for a while now, yet the article still says it does.votan (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, Elo Rating was maintained until February 2012, not September 2011. Hahahopp (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

outdated information

There is a ton of historic information mentioned in this article. Is it really useful to mention Extended, Block Constructed, Rochester Draft, Arena League, Hecatomb etc.? I am a bit hesitant to remove it all in a sweep, but it seems like the correct thing to do. Disagreements? OdinFK (talk) 06:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

This article is out of date - there is no longer a separate entity called the "DCI", and save for some things that are still named for it (DCI numbers, DCI memberships), almost everything in this article would be better placed under either "Wizards Play Network" (sanctions stores and events), "Magic: the Gathering Organized Play" (types and formats of events, qualifying for events, etc), and "Magic: the Gathering Judge Program" (which is now completely separate from the above). Unfortunately, it's hard to do this without relying on primary sources.

I'd like to work on some such updates - transitioning this article to be mostly about the historical entity, writing/renovating articles about the WPN and Judge Program, and properly linking and sourcing them. First, I'd like to see if anyone would object to those sorts of changes. Thanks, IronWolf314 (talk) 17:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]