This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article needs NPOVing - the last paragraph in particular is highly partisan, and it does not mention, for example, the ICP's role in putting the Ba'athists in power. It also omits any detail in the more recent information, such as the IFTU union federation dominated by the party, and does not mention any of the many splits it has suffered, of which at least the Worker Communist Party of Iraq is of some importance. Warofdreams 10:17, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Is the WCPI really an ICP split? I think it's more that WCPIraq is a spin-off of WCPIran exiles in Iraqi Kurdistan.--Soman 10:22, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
What a quick reaction! You've much improved the article already, and while it could still do with expansion, I agree you've addressed the POV issues. I'll check the WCPI info, but yes, I think I may be wrong on that. Warofdreams 10:51, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Did the ICP really oppose the US invasion in 2003? All the non-ICP sources I've read, including news stories at the time, indicate that the ICP critically supported the invasion, with the caveat that they would have preferred the UN doing it instead of the US. 98.234.252.4 (talk) 20:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They certainly opposed it before it took place. Once it occured, they had a pragmatic approach, arguing that their situation was akin to that of Italian communists in late WWII. --Soman (talk) 21:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Christopher Hitchens claimed that the CP were in favour of an invasion. He knew them well. You need to provide a source, Soman. Though so do we... --StephanNaro (talk) 21:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]