Talk:Hedda Gabler

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2020 and 30 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Haley.carter1.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Mid‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References in popular culture

Someone (anonymous/IP) added a link to Y: The Last Man under the section of references in popular culture. Does anyone know why? How (if at all) does that refer to Hedda Gabler? The reference was not formatted correctly so I've removed it for now, but please restore it, if appropriate, with a reference. Mooncow 19:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support. I support the merging of the two articles. Cheers! Dreamy 02:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confused. I don't know if i've posted this right, so i apologize if i've done this wrong. My reason for posting is i want to know what's wrong with the article? I found it very helpful and useful? (AdamJKB (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Analysis of Text

The analysis of the play needs to be revamped. I fixed a bunch of grammatical issues, but I didn't change the content. It isn't written very well and it's more subjective than anything else. I think it could also go more in depth.

OddEyes 00:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree OddEyes. Also, who is haddon Gelai (seen in the characters list). I cannot find any reference to him in the text. Please correct me if I am wrong, but if not please remove. Daniel.thorpe (talk) 02:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Divorced?

The character listing for Mrs. Elvstead states that she is divorced. Is this stated in the text of the play? I can't find it. And if she is divorced, why is she refered to as Mrs. Elvstead? Floggolozzo (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Hedda Gabler (2005 revival)

The information in the article about the revival should be included in the main article for this play. I don't really see the point in creating a stub article for a theatrical play revival. _noisy jinx ^huh? 03:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was Eilert Lövborg (Ejlert Løvborg) based on Nietzsche?

The reference to writing a book about the future reminds me of Friedrich Nietzsche's extrapolations, does anyone else agree? I googled for "Hedda Gabler" & Nietzsche together but just found some comparisons between Nietzsche and Ibsen himself. It seems Løvborg was cast as a bit of a libertine, I'm not sure if that would accurately describe Nietzche's deconstrutions of social constraints. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.163.206.117 (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Hedda Gabler as a Feminist Work

Hello all,
Draft:Hedda Gabler as a Feminist Work was created by Tbloommusic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) on 26 April 2015. It now a WP:G13 candidate. The draft was the user's only contribution.
It appears to me like term paper that was posted to Wikipedia, but it does contain some references from reliable sources that may merit inclusion (or WP:MERGE-ing, with citations, and attribution, of course) in the Critical interpretation section of the article.
What do you think about this?
Pete "people don't do such things!" AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hedda Gabler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151120014019/http://noviembreteatro.es/en-cartel/hedda-gabler/ to http://noviembreteatro.es/en-cartel/hedda-gabler/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]