User talk:Rronline
Hello Rronline, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.
Here are some useful links in case you haven't found them yet;
If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump.
Angela 01:55, 2 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Hello. In regard to Crisana: You cannot assume that the way a reader of a disambiguation page reached that page was by looking for it. For example, the reader may have read this: "John Smith visited a remarkable place in Romania." If you click on "remarkable place", you reach the Crisana disambiguation page. 67.4.150.5 14:40, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Image in signature
[edit]Hi. I want to ask you to remove the image from your signature. It detracts from the content of the messages you write (although just a bit), and wastes valuable server and network resources. I don't object to people adding some character to their signature, but feel that using inline images is too heavy. — David Remahl 19:28, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- OK, I understand what you mean. I have removed the image - I really do hope there wasn't any political reason though because other people have images in their signatures too. Rronline 08:53, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks! There was absolutely no political motive behind my request. I sent the same request to another user with a picture in the signature (not a flag). Though I don't believe Wikipedia benefits from nationalism in any way shape or form (as I said, not related to my request. I also understand that the EU flag can be interpreted as an expression of internationalism.) — David Remahl 09:18, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Your image of Oradea
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Oradea.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks so much, – Quadell (talk) (help)[[]] 01:59, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know where it came from. I marked it as GFDL. Any user who uploads a picture to Wikipedia agrees to license it under the GFDL. (Of course, if the uploader doesn't own the copyright, he can't license the image at all.) In this case, the uploader owned the copyright, uploaded it, and didn't specify an alternate license, so GFDL is the default. Thanks again! – Quadell (talk) (help)[[]] 12:37, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)
I made the picture! And I uploaded it to the Dutch Wikipedia in Nov 02 already. But GFDL, of course. Fransvannes 13:46, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Palatul Cinevalui
[edit]It looks to me like when you moved Palace of the People (Romania) to Palace of the Parliament (Romania) the history of the article was entirely lost. Perhaps I am doing something wrong, so do have a look for yourself, but assuming that this is the case, do you have any idea what happened and whether it is remediable? If not by one of us, maybe by someone with a higher level of privilege? -- Jmabel 05:03, Oct 11, 2004 (UTC)
- (copied from talk page of Jmabel|Talk) The reason why history was lost on the page Palace of the Parliament was because it was a new page, in fact a redirect, therefore it had no history, and it was moved manually. The original history of the article can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Palace_of_the_Parliament_%28Romania%29&action=history, which is on the page for Palace of the Parliament (Romania), now a redirect. Finally, thanks again for all your contributions on Romanian subjects at Wikipedia and Wikitravel... it's great to see someone from another country interested in Romania and its culture. Rronline 11:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Do I understand this to mean you did a cut-and-paste move? That's kind of a no-no. See Wikipedia:How to fix cut and paste moves. (şi mulţumesc pentru sentimentul...). If I understand correctly, do you want to try to fix it, or should I? -- Jmabel|Talk 20:45, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)
The page history is important for intellectual property reasons. When you (or I or anyone else) writes material in the Wikipedia, we individually retain copyright on what we write; we are donating rights to Wikipedia under GFDL. The editing history is the record of who actually owns intellectual property rights beyond use under GFDL. -- Jmabel|Talk 18:17, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
I've fixed it. Thanks for your help in sorting this out. -- Jmabel|Talk 18:43, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
You might be interested to have a look. Regards --Pgreenfinch 12:47, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Cut-and-paste moves
[edit]Hi, you used a cut-and-paste move to move Kharkiv and Kharkov around. Please don't do cut-and-paste moves, as it separates the article from its history, which we need to keep for Wikipedia:Copyright reasons. Please use WP:RM for help with moves if the "Move this page" link/tab doesn't work. I will fix this one - have you done any others? Thanks! Noel (talk) 00:32, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
PS: I don't usually check other User_talk: pages (so that I don't have to monitor a whole long list of User_Talk: pages - one for each person with whom I am having a "conversation"), so please leave any messages for me on my talk page (above); if you leave a message for me here I probably will not see it. I know not everyone uses this style (they would rather keep all the text of a thread in one place), but I simply can't monitor all the User_talk: pages I leave messages on. Thanks!
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Zapp logo.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Zapp logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)