Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forensics
Appearance
Empty Page. It's linked to by Forensic science, another empty page.--|Prospero
- Ahem. Before nominating something for deletion, please check the "history" tab, to see if it has been vandalised. This was the case here - the article was blanked by some vandal. I've restored the content. I strongly suggest the nominator remove the VfD tag. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 23:06, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Concur. This doesn't belong on VfD. Kevyn 23:07, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Support early end of this debate, which is when the VfD tag should be removed. If there are no votes to delete, IMO the nominator could and should do this as soon as they like to. Andrewa 00:28, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Support early end of this debate. This article has been around since 3/02, and has had valuable contributions from many editors before being vandalized, and serves as a good linkage point for the various specialties in forensics. Niteowlneils 00:49, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, delist early, and spank Prospero for not checking for blanking. -- Cyrius|✎ 01:30, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Whoo... completely forgot. Way Sorry, guys. --User:Prospero